KUALA LUMPUR: The Sepang Municipal Council has no power to issue
notices for the removal of two Automated Enforcement System (AES) poles
and cameras on two federal roads, a High Court heard.
Lead
counsel Alex De Silva, who acted for Beta Tegap Sdn Bhd, one of two
companies appointed by the Government to manage the AES, said the
North-South Highway (PLUS) and South Klang Valley Expressway (SKVE) were
declared federal roads.
“The council cannot use the Street,
Drainage and Building Act 1974 to interfere on the construction of
structures on the highways,” he added.
He argued that PLUS
and SKVE were concession highways under the control and management of
the Malaysian Highway Authority, which had given the approval to carry
out the installation of poles and cameras.
De Silva said the
company did not commit any offence under the said Act, as contended by
the council in its notice, because poles and cameras could not be
considered as “buildings”.
He argued that the council did not
intend to provide any opportunity for the company to be heard and had
already made up its mind to tear down the AES poles.
“This is
further evidenced by the stand taken by the Selangor Government that the
structures are illegal and will not be allowed to be erected in the
state.
“Thus, any application for planning permission, which in
any event is not required, would have been an exercise in futility,” he
said.
He submitted that the case was not about the efficiency of
the AES system and asked the court to quash three decisions made by the
council over the poles and cameras.
He applied to the court to grant a declaration that the council does not have jurisdiction over the PLUS and SKVE highways.
Senior
Federal Counsel Amarjeet Singh, who acted for the Attorney-General’s
Chambers as an intervenor, submitted that the proper authority – with
jurisdiction to approve the applications to set up the AES on highways –
was the Works Minister, pursuant to Section 85(1) of the Road Transport
Act 1987.
He said both highways had been declared federal roads,
while submitted that the notices ought to be quashed on grounds of
“illegality”.
Lead counsel Gobind Singh Deo, who acted for the
council, argued that his client had wide power in taking action on
structures built without authority on state land and that the issuance
of notices was in accordance with the law.
High Court (Appellate
and Special Powers) judge Justice Zaleha Yusof set Feb 21 to deliver
decision after hearing lengthy submissions by both parties on the merits
of the judicial reviews.
Beta Tegap is seeking, among others, an
order to quash the council’s Nov 19 decision that it needed to have
planning permission to install the cameras at KM301.7 of the PLUS
heading towards Kuala Lumpur and the other at KM6.6 of the SKVE heading
towards Kajang.
Source From :
The Star
